Unintended Consequences of Closing Horse Slaughter Plants

News of Interest to Horsemen

"Intermediate"
Unintended Consequences of Closing Horse Slaughter Plants
Congressmen and women apparently seldom give consideration to the consequences of their laws
Submitted by Don Blazer, 7/23/2009

You ought to be knowin’ before you’re goin’.

Congress ought to make that a law before they make any other
laws…especially laws about the slaughter of horses or the
transportation of horses for slaughter.

But no, Congressmen and women apparently seldom give
consideration to the consequences of their laws. (Harsh statement?
How’s our country doin’ these days?) Congress reacts (sort of a knee
jerk or just plain jerk) to their counterparts--emotion-driven
non-thinkers who never consider anything but their short-sighted pleas
for action.

I’m not saying that there aren’t some things that I’d like
to see changed about how horses are slaughtered or transported. I
think both should be done in the most humane manner possible, which as
most experts will attest, was how it was done in US slaughter plants.
If we could make it even more humane, I’d support that.

But banning the slaughter of horses in the US, whether for
human consumption or otherwise, did nothing more than create a worse
fate for the horse, many horse owners and most operating within the
horse industry. Lawmakers didn’t think about the consequences;
mostly they didn’t think.

And why base the ban on the slaughter of horses for human
consumption? It is silly and stupid to protest the horse suffers more
if his remains are to be eaten by a human.

Euthanize the horse in the most humane manner you can think
of, and the horse is still dead. Believe me, the horse hasn’t given
one thought to whether or not a human will consume his remains, nor
has he given thought to the idea that someone may write a poem about
him, or put flowers on a special maker to commemorate his being. The
horse is dead.

The thoughtless actions of Congress have created greater
suffering for a lot of horses…now, sick, or old, or lame or starving,
or happy and healthy, horses are being shipped to farther distances to
be slaughtered in much less humane ways.

Are you happy about your law which had no plan as to how to
care for the 100,000 horses per year which could no longer be
slaughtered in the US?

Are you happy about the horses now being abandoned, starved,
uncared for? Maybe you’re proud that the horse rescues are overrun
with horses they can’t take in, or that it’s necessary to create new
groups to “meet the needs of unwanted horses.”

Are you happy about horses being shipped longer distances
without food or water in filthy cramped trailers.

Aren’t you proud of your poorly thought-out laws?

Congress and emotional non-thinkers must be proud, because
they are about to do it again.

John Conyers (D-Mich) and Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind) introduced
the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act to essentially stop the export of
horses to Canada and Mexico.

Has anyone given any consideration to what this bill means?

First it means there will soon be criminal activity
involving the transportation of horses for slaughter. If there is a
market demand for horse meat, the market is going to get horse meat.

Second it means the horses are going to be transported in
even worse ways than they are today.

Thirdly it means someone has to enforce the law. Who is
going to do that--another agency ill-equipped to do the job, but
happily spending taxpayer dollars?

Jump in Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) who introduced the Horse
Transportation Safety Act (HR 305) to prohibit the interstate
transport of “any” horse in a double-deck truck. The US Dept. of
Agriculture proposed rules to prohibit the transport of horses to
slaughter in such vehicles.

Kirk said he was prompted to introduce the legislation due
to an accident in which a double-deck truck carrying horses overturned
killing or causing to be euthanized 18 horses.

Neither bill has given consideration to the consequences.
And neither addresses the inhumane treatment of horses if and when it
does exist. (I know that it often does exist.)

The problem is not that the truck is a double-decker; it’s
that the horses aren’t being treated humanely in many cases…but there
are plenty of laws already on the books to deal with inhuman treatment
of animals.

While federal lawmakers are going in one direction, North
Dakota lawmakers are setting aside money to study the possibility of
opening an equine processing plant.

And according to Utah state senator Dennis Stowell, the
Utah State Legislature is considering a resolution calling on the U.S.
Congress to discontinue work on the bill making it illegal to send
horses to other countries for slaughter. Wyoming legislature is also
requesting the matter of horse slaughter be left to the states, and
the Missouri legislature is asking Congress to leave the matter of
horse transport to slaughter up to the states.

“The actions in Washington, D.C. have created a problem for
horse owners,” said North Dakota Rep. Rod Froelich, D-Selfridge.

No kidding, Rod!!!

Associated links:

Would you like to comment on this article? (opens popup)

No records found!